Draft:Crush: Message in a Bottle
| Submission declined on 1 November 2024 by Bearcat (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 11 September 2024 by Lemonaka (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Lemonaka 51 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 27 April 2024 by Bearcat (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Bearcat 6 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 12 April 2024 by Bearcat (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Bearcat 6 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 28 March 2024 by BuySomeApples (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by BuySomeApples 7 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 15 March 2024 by Guessitsavis (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner. Declined by Guessitsavis 7 months ago. | |
Comment: Thank you for finally removing all the primary source footnotes. But now the only two citations present here at all are Point of View and The Globe and Mail -- as I said the first time I commented, however, those are acceptable reliable sources but they don't add up to enough coverage to get this film over WP:GNG all by themselves if they're all the reliable source coverage this film has, and you haven't added any new reliable sourcing over and above those two.
Films are not automatically "entitled" to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist. We would need to see either a stronger notability claim than just "film that exists" (e.g. a Canadian Screen Award nomination) or more than just two hits of GNG-worthy third party media coverage, before this could be accepted. Bearcat (talk) 14:55, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Reddit is not a trustworthy source. And no improvement since last declined. -Lemonaka 01:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: This still hasn't had any new WP:GNG-worthy sourcing added since the last time it was rejected. TVO's self-published press release is still there even though I explained last time that it isn't acceptable sourcing, because it's a directly-affiliated source and not third-party coverage — and the only new things that have been added are podcasts in which Maya Gallus is talking about her own film in the first person, not GNG-building third-party coverage in real media, even though the first reviewer also already told you not to use podcasts.
So we still only have the exact same two acceptable sources as last time, and that's still not enough. Bearcat (talk) 01:59, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: You have not markedly improved the draft since the last time it was rejected. The footnotes are to primary sources directly affiliated with the claims -- the self-published catalogues of film festivals that screened the film do not establish notability, and neither do TVO's own press releases announcing the scheduling of its own "TVO Original" programming. Notability requires third-party media coverage in third-party sources, fully independent of the claims being made -- so The Globe and Mail and POV are fine, but still not in and of themselves enough, and you haven't added anything new that counts at all. Bearcat (talk) 23:22, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: This might be notable but it needs a lot of work. The refs to film festivals and primary sources should be removed, podcasts too. Any independent film reviews and other news coverage should be used as refs. BuySomeApples (talk) 01:04, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
| Crush: Message in a Bottle | |
|---|---|
| Directed by | Maya Gallus |
| Written by | Maya Gallus |
| Produced by | Howard Fraiberg Maya Gallus |
| Cinematography | John Tran |
| Edited by | Dave Kazala |
| Music by | Garth Stevenson |
| Distributed by | Red Queen Productions |
| Country | Canada |
| Language | English |
"Crush: Message in a Bottle" is a cinematic documentary following a year in the life of artisanal winemakers and growers during one of the most historically difficult harvests in the Niagara region.
Featuring winegrower Ann-Marie Saunders (whose Jamaican-lineage family are pioneers in the region, dedicated to labour intensive regenerative farming)[1], winemaker Kelly Mason (a first generation female farmer devoted to the risky, hands on craft of low intervention wild ferment winemaking), winemaker Shiraz Mottiar (celebrated as the "King of Gamay", who actively promotes diversity and sustainability in the industry), as well as esteemed winemaker Thomas Bachelder(trained in Burgundy, now dedicated to exploring the various terroir of the Niagara region).[2]
The film premiered at the Devour: the Food Film Fest! on October 28, 2023, followed by several international film festival screenings, including HotDocs, Santa Barbara Film Festival and the Most Festival internacional de Cinema del Vi i el Cava in the Penedes where it received the Sustainability Award.
References
[edit]- ^ Glassman, M (2023, November 3). Crush Review: A Zestful Celebration of Ontario’s Wineries. POV Magazine
- ^ The Globe and Mail. (2022, June 30). New Canadian film captures the growing pains of winemaking in Niagara. The Globe and Mail.